MDS Abstracts

Abstracts from the International Congress of Parkinson’s and Movement Disorders.

MENU 
  • Home
  • Meetings Archive
    • 2024 International Congress
    • 2023 International Congress
    • 2022 International Congress
    • MDS Virtual Congress 2021
    • MDS Virtual Congress 2020
    • 2019 International Congress
    • 2018 International Congress
    • 2017 International Congress
    • 2016 International Congress
  • Keyword Index
  • Resources
  • Advanced Search

Do different tic phenotypes have different responses to comprehensive behavioral intervention for tics (CBIT)?

W. Deeb, L. Almeida, H. Simpson, I. Malaty, M. Okun (Gainesville, FL, USA)

Meeting: 2016 International Congress

Abstract Number: 973

Keywords: Tics(also see Gilles de la Tourette syndrome): Treatment

Session Information

Date: Tuesday, June 21, 2016

Session Title: Tics/Stereotypies

Session Time: 12:30pm-2:00pm

Location: Exhibit Hall located in Hall B, Level 2

Objective: To evaluate 1) the types of tics undergoing CBIT at an expert movement disorders center and 2) to evaluate the response of each tic phenotype to CBIT by utilizing a tic hierarchy questionnaire.

Background: CBIT has been shown in multiple RCTs to significantly improve motor and vocal tic control in patients with Tourette syndrome. A possible differential response to CBIT by tic phenotype has not been extensively investigated.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of our tertiary referral center’s Tourette syndrome population undergoing CBIT. We excluded patients with two or less treatment visits. The patient and/or the parent completed a tic hierarchy questionnaire at the initial visit and the final visit during a CBIT session. Each patient had a 10-session CBIT goal.

Results: There were 30 patients with a mean age of 19.4 (SD 12.5) years and a mean number of visits of 6.4 (SD 1.9). All tic phenotypes were assessed but only the following tics revealed a statistically significant improvement with CBIT: darting eyes, facial grimace, head forward, throwing head back, shrugging shoulders, quick flexion/extension of arms and stimulus dependent tics. There was no correlation between the age or number of visits and the treatment response.

Conclusions: Our data suggest that CBIT may have a differential effect and more positive effect on tics with head and proximal upper extremity involvement. Larger and prospective studies will be needed as well as a more careful characterization of the pre-monitory urge component.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

W. Deeb, L. Almeida, H. Simpson, I. Malaty, M. Okun. Do different tic phenotypes have different responses to comprehensive behavioral intervention for tics (CBIT)? [abstract]. Mov Disord. 2016; 31 (suppl 2). https://www.mdsabstracts.org/abstract/do-different-tic-phenotypes-have-different-responses-to-comprehensive-behavioral-intervention-for-tics-cbit/. Accessed June 14, 2025.
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2016 International Congress

MDS Abstracts - https://www.mdsabstracts.org/abstract/do-different-tic-phenotypes-have-different-responses-to-comprehensive-behavioral-intervention-for-tics-cbit/

Most Viewed Abstracts

  • This Week
  • This Month
  • All Time
  • Humor processing is affected by Parkinson’s disease and levodopa
      • Help & Support
      • About Us
      • Cookies & Privacy
      • Wiley Job Network
      • Terms & Conditions
      • Advertisers & Agents
      Copyright © 2025 International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society. All Rights Reserved.
      Wiley