MDS Abstracts

Abstracts from the International Congress of Parkinson’s and Movement Disorders.

MENU 
  • Home
  • Meetings Archive
    • 2024 International Congress
    • 2023 International Congress
    • 2022 International Congress
    • MDS Virtual Congress 2021
    • MDS Virtual Congress 2020
    • 2019 International Congress
    • 2018 International Congress
    • 2017 International Congress
    • 2016 International Congress
  • Keyword Index
  • Resources
  • Advanced Search

Artificial Intelligence and Visual Analysis of Movements in Parkinson’s Disease

T. Okelberry, H. Beisar, S. Horev, E. Pinchuk, K. Lyons, R. Pahwa (Kansas City, USA)

Meeting: 2024 International Congress

Abstract Number: 1208

Keywords: Parkinson’s, Scales

Category: Technology

Objective: To evaluate the use of artificial intelligence in the analysis and classification of movements in Parkinson’s disease.

Background: Artificial intelligence (AI) is a powerful tool that is now being harnessed in many ways to advance medicine.  AI can process visual data to analyze movements and make classifications.  In this study, we evaluated a novel AI algorithm designed to analyze movements in patients with Parkinson’s disease (PD).

Method: Patients with PD and healthy controls were videotaped performing the movements used for the Movement Disorder Society Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) motor subscale (part III).  Six components (right/left finger tapping, right/left hand movements, right/left pronation-supination) were evaluated and graded by human raters and by the AI algorithm.  Human raters and team members executing the AI algorithm were blinded to participant diagnosis.

Results: Ten patients with PD and ten healthy controls were recruited. Fifty percent were men, and the mean age was 68.4 years.  Participants with PD had a mean disease duration of 7 years, median Hoehn and Yahr score of 2, and mean MDS-UPDRS part III score of 37.1.  The average length of decrements, as quantified by the algorithm, was 36.3 for PD and 22.6 for controls (p = 0.03).  The average number of interruptions was 7.6 for PD and 5.2 for controls (p = 0.09).  The kinematic measurements that proved to be the best discriminators between PD and healthy controls were decrements mean length (AUC 0.73), peak regression slope (AUC 0.66), halt count (AUC 0.64), regressions mean (AUC 0.64), and velocity regression slope (AUC 0.64).

Conclusion: The AI algorithm successfully evaluated visual data of patients’ movements and quantified movement parameters.  Analysis of decrement, interruptions, and velocity through the algorithm demonstrated a low-to-moderate ability to differentiate PD participants from healthy controls.  AI analysis of movement is a promising tool that may one day serve as a more objective measurement of disease progression and treatment efficacy for routine care and clinical trials.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

T. Okelberry, H. Beisar, S. Horev, E. Pinchuk, K. Lyons, R. Pahwa. Artificial Intelligence and Visual Analysis of Movements in Parkinson’s Disease [abstract]. Mov Disord. 2024; 39 (suppl 1). https://www.mdsabstracts.org/abstract/artificial-intelligence-and-visual-analysis-of-movements-in-parkinsons-disease/. Accessed June 14, 2025.
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2024 International Congress

MDS Abstracts - https://www.mdsabstracts.org/abstract/artificial-intelligence-and-visual-analysis-of-movements-in-parkinsons-disease/

Most Viewed Abstracts

  • This Week
  • This Month
  • All Time
  • Humor processing is affected by Parkinson’s disease and levodopa
      • Help & Support
      • About Us
      • Cookies & Privacy
      • Wiley Job Network
      • Terms & Conditions
      • Advertisers & Agents
      Copyright © 2025 International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society. All Rights Reserved.
      Wiley