MDS Abstracts

Abstracts from the International Congress of Parkinson’s and Movement Disorders.

MENU 
  • Home
  • Meetings Archive
    • 2024 International Congress
    • 2023 International Congress
    • 2022 International Congress
    • MDS Virtual Congress 2021
    • MDS Virtual Congress 2020
    • 2019 International Congress
    • 2018 International Congress
    • 2017 International Congress
    • 2016 International Congress
  • Keyword Index
  • Resources
  • Advanced Search

Diagnostic accuracy of common bedside ataxia examination tests

R. Thompson, P. Woolman, D.E. Bhatti, A. Hellman, J.M. Bertoni, D. Torres-Russotto (Omaha, NE, USA)

Meeting: 2016 International Congress

Abstract Number: 1546

Keywords: Ataxia: Clinical features, Tremors: Clinical features

Session Information

Date: Wednesday, June 22, 2016

Session Title: Phenomenology and clinical assessment of movement disorders

Session Time: 12:00pm-1:30pm

Location: Exhibit Hall located in Hall B, Level 2

Objective: To compare the diagnostic accuracy of common bedside examination tests for upper limb ataxia.

Background: Although a number of ataxia scales have been validated, common bedside ataxia tests are used in routine practice without much knowledge of their diagnostic accuracy or reliability.

Methods: 27 healthcare individuals were recruited to blindly evaluate the presence or absence of ataxia in 36 videos. The participants included 6 medical students, 2 midlevel providers, 5 physicians in residency (3 neurology residents), 2 non-neurology specialists and 12 neurologists (4 movement disorders specialist). The videos depicted 6 common ataxia tests, in 6 people (4 patients with ataxia, 1 patient with dystonia without ataxia, and a healthy control). Ataxia severity ranged from mild-to-severe, based on BARS (Brief Ataxia Rating Scale) measures. Finger-to-nose (FNF), Finger tapping (FT), Sequential finger tapping (SFT), Thigh Alternating Patting (TAP), and Finger-Following-Finger (FFF) tests were included. FNF was performed allowing the patient’s arm full extension (FNF-E) or with restricted range of motion (FNF-R). Study data were collected and managed using REDCap electronic data capture tools hosted at the University of Nebraska Medical Center. The participants followed a web link to REDCap, where instructions on test interpretation were given, followed by a sequential listing of the cases. Each video showed a single test performed in a single patient, and was followed by the question: Is ataxia present? Sensitivity, Specificity and likelihood ratios were calculated for each test.

Results: The most sensitive test for upper appendicular ataxia was the FFF (Sensitivity = 90.74%, NLR=0.19). The most specific test was the TAP (Specificity = 90.74%, PLR=6.9). Sensitivity/Specificity for the other tests were as follows: FNF-E= 67.59%/81.48%; FNF-R=52.78%/87.04%; FT= 58.33%/77.78%; SFT= 69.44%/79.63%. When measured by neurologists, the FFF and the TAP test remained the top performers.

Conclusions: The Finger-Following-Finger test is the most sensitive test for upper appendicular ataxia. The diagnostic accuracy of bedside examination tests for ataxia does not seem to align well with current use and common teaching practices. Further studies are needed to measure reliability, and to ascertain the effects of level of training, experience, and specialty, in the diagnostic accuracy of ataxia tests.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

R. Thompson, P. Woolman, D.E. Bhatti, A. Hellman, J.M. Bertoni, D. Torres-Russotto. Diagnostic accuracy of common bedside ataxia examination tests [abstract]. Mov Disord. 2016; 31 (suppl 2). https://www.mdsabstracts.org/abstract/diagnostic-accuracy-of-common-bedside-ataxia-examination-tests/. Accessed June 14, 2025.
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2016 International Congress

MDS Abstracts - https://www.mdsabstracts.org/abstract/diagnostic-accuracy-of-common-bedside-ataxia-examination-tests/

Most Viewed Abstracts

  • This Week
  • This Month
  • All Time
  • Humor processing is affected by Parkinson’s disease and levodopa
      • Help & Support
      • About Us
      • Cookies & Privacy
      • Wiley Job Network
      • Terms & Conditions
      • Advertisers & Agents
      Copyright © 2025 International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society. All Rights Reserved.
      Wiley