MDS Abstracts

Abstracts from the International Congress of Parkinson’s and Movement Disorders.

MENU 
  • Home
  • Meetings Archive
    • 2025 International Congress
    • 2024 International Congress
    • 2023 International Congress
    • 2022 International Congress
    • MDS Virtual Congress 2021
    • MDS Virtual Congress 2020
    • 2019 International Congress
    • 2018 International Congress
    • 2017 International Congress
    • 2016 International Congress
  • Keyword Index
  • Resources
  • Advanced Search

Muscle Coactivation in subjects with Parkinson’s Disease: a Healthy-matched analysis of the Sub-Phases of Gait Cycle

D. Bonacina, D. Tosatto, M. Leonardi, C. Perin, C. Alessandro, D. Piscitelli (Milano, Italy)

Meeting: 2025 International Congress

Keywords: Electromyogram(EMG), Gait disorders: Clinical features, Parkinson’s

Category: Parkinson's Disease: Epidemiology, Phenomenology, Clinical Assessment, Rating Scales

Objective: To compare lower limb muscle coactivation (MC) during gait between Parkinson’s disease (PD) and healthy controls (HC).

Background: MC increases with aging as a response to postural control deterioration [1]. While MC enhances static stability, it may reduce dynamic postural stability and movement efficiency [2,3]. negatively affecting gait and increasing fall risk [4]. Individuals with PD exhibits rigidity, bradikinesia and poor postural control [5] and these symptoms may be further exacerbated by MC. However, alterations of MC in PD are still unclear with conflicting findings [6-8].

Method: Subjects walked at self-selected speed on a 10m linear path. Muscle activity (5 muscles for lower limb) were recorded with surface EMG (Cometa ZeroWire). EMG data were normalized to peak activation, and integral was estimated to obtain the ‘area under the curve’ (AUC). Coactivation Index (CI) was then computed as:  as 2*[(overlapping AUC of M1 and M2)/(AUC of M1 + M2)] for each couple of muscles [9]: Tibialis anterior (TA) vs Gastrocnemius medialis (GM), TA vs Soleus (SOL), Vastus Medialis (VM) vs Biceps Femoris (BF). Data between groups were compared using unpaired T test (SPSS).

Results: Fifteen individuals with idiopathic PD (age: 63.4 ± 6.1 years; H&Y: 2.3 ± 0.6) and ten matched HC (age: 62.2 ± 7.6 years) were enrolled. Regarding CIs, no statistical differences were found between groups [Figure 1], despite that a qualitative comparison of EMG signals in specific sub-phases of gait cycle (GC) was performed. PD tended to show higher recruitment of both BF and VM during mid stance (MS: 10-40% of GC) with a sustained activation of VM during push-off (PO: 40-60% of GC) and an earlier and higher recruitment of BF [Figure 2]. During the first part of PO (40-50% of GC), PD appeared to have a higher recruitment of TA associated to lower activation of plantarflexors (GM and SOL). However, PD showed a higher and persistent recruitment of GM in early swing (ES:60-75% of GC) [Figure 3].

Conclusion: MC’s role in PD remains unclear, requiring further research. Our preliminary analysis highlights the importance of investigating muscle recruitment patterns and their interdependencies across specific gait cycle sub-phases as each requires distinct adaptations that may influence MC differently. A sub-phase-specific approach could provide a clearer understanding of MC compared to an overall gait cycle analysis.

Coactivation Index: comparison between groups

Coactivation Index: comparison between groups

Vastus Medialis VS Biceps Femoris

Vastus Medialis VS Biceps Femoris

Soleus or Gastro Medialis VS Tibialis Anterior

Soleus or Gastro Medialis VS Tibialis Anterior

References: 1) Nagai K, Yamada M, Mori S, et al. Effect of the muscle coactivation during quiet standing on dynamic postural control in older adults. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2013;56(1):129-133. doi:10.1016/j.archger.2012.08.009
2) Tucker MG, Kavanagh JJ, Barrett RS, Morrison S. Age-related differences in postural reaction time and coordination during voluntary sway movements. Hum Mov Sci. 2008;27(5):728-737. doi:10.1016/j.humov.2008.03.002
3) Allum JH, Carpenter MG, Honegger F, Adkin AL, Bloem BR. Age-dependent variations in the directional sensitivity of balance corrections and compensatory arm movements in man. J Physiol. 2002;542(Pt 2):643-663. doi:10.1113/jphysiol.2001.015644
4) Hortobágyi T, Solnik S, Gruber A, et al. Interaction between age and gait velocity in the amplitude and timing of antagonist muscle coactivation. Gait Posture. 2009;29(4):558-564. doi:10.1016/j.gaitpost.2008.12.007
5) Moustafa AA, Chakravarthy S, Phillips JR, et al. Motor symptoms in Parkinson’s disease: A unified framework. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2016;68:727-740. doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.07.010
6) Dietz V, Zijlstra W, Prokop T, Berger W. Leg muscle activation during gait in Parkinson’s disease: adaptation and interlimb coordination. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1995;97(6):408-415. doi:10.1016/0924-980x(95)00109-x
7) Arias P, Espinosa N, Robles-García V, Cao R, Cudeiro J. Antagonist muscle co-activation during straight walking and its relation to kinematics: insight from young, elderly and Parkinson’s disease. Brain Res. 2012;1455:124-131. doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2012.03.033
8) Lang KC, Hackney ME, Ting LH, McKay JL. Antagonist muscle activity during reactive balance responses is elevated in Parkinson’s disease and in balance impairment. PLoS One. 2019;14(1):e0211137. Published 2019 Jan 25. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0211137
9) Keloth SM, Arjunan SP, Raghav S, Kumar DK. Muscle activation strategies of people with early-stage Parkinson’s during walking. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2021;18(1):133. Published 2021 Sep 8. doi:10.1186/s12984-021-00932-1

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

D. Bonacina, D. Tosatto, M. Leonardi, C. Perin, C. Alessandro, D. Piscitelli. Muscle Coactivation in subjects with Parkinson’s Disease: a Healthy-matched analysis of the Sub-Phases of Gait Cycle [abstract]. Mov Disord. 2025; 40 (suppl 1). https://www.mdsabstracts.org/abstract/muscle-coactivation-in-subjects-with-parkinsons-disease-a-healthy-matched-analysis-of-the-sub-phases-of-gait-cycle/. Accessed October 5, 2025.
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2025 International Congress

MDS Abstracts - https://www.mdsabstracts.org/abstract/muscle-coactivation-in-subjects-with-parkinsons-disease-a-healthy-matched-analysis-of-the-sub-phases-of-gait-cycle/

Most Viewed Abstracts

  • This Week
  • This Month
  • All Time
  • What is the appropriate sleep position for Parkinson's disease patients with orthostatic hypotension in the morning?
  • Covid vaccine induced parkinsonism and cognitive dysfunction
  • Life expectancy with and without Parkinson’s disease in the general population
  • Increased Risks of Botulinum Toxin Injection in Patients with Hypermobility Ehlers Danlos Syndrome: A Case Series
  • AI-Powered Detection of Freezing of Gait Using Wearable Sensor Data in Patients with Parkinson’s Disease
  • Effect of Ketone Ester Supplementation on Motor and Non-Motor symptoms in Parkinson's Disease
  • Covid vaccine induced parkinsonism and cognitive dysfunction
  • What is the appropriate sleep position for Parkinson's disease patients with orthostatic hypotension in the morning?
  • Life expectancy with and without Parkinson’s disease in the general population
  • Increased Risks of Botulinum Toxin Injection in Patients with Hypermobility Ehlers Danlos Syndrome: A Case Series
  • Increased Risks of Botulinum Toxin Injection in Patients with Hypermobility Ehlers Danlos Syndrome: A Case Series
  • Insulin dependent diabetes and hand tremor
  • Improvement in hand tremor following carpal tunnel release surgery
  • Impact of expiratory muscle strength training (EMST) on phonatory performance in Parkinson's patients
  • Help & Support
  • About Us
  • Cookies & Privacy
  • Wiley Job Network
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Advertisers & Agents
Copyright © 2025 International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society. All Rights Reserved.
Wiley