MDS Abstracts

Abstracts from the International Congress of Parkinson’s and Movement Disorders.

MENU 
  • Home
  • Meetings Archive
    • 2024 International Congress
    • 2023 International Congress
    • 2022 International Congress
    • MDS Virtual Congress 2021
    • MDS Virtual Congress 2020
    • 2019 International Congress
    • 2018 International Congress
    • 2017 International Congress
    • 2016 International Congress
  • Keyword Index
  • Resources
  • Advanced Search

Effectiveness of Levodopa responsiveness of Blink reflex recovery: An objective method to differentiate Parkinsonian syndromes

C. Gaddipati, M. Umaiorubahan, C.U. Velmurugendran, V. Shankar (Chennai, India)

Meeting: 2016 International Congress

Abstract Number: 1259

Keywords: Brainstem reflexes, Levodopa(L-dopa), Parkinsonism, Progressive supranuclear palsy(PSP)

Session Information

Date: Wednesday, June 22, 2016

Session Title: Parkinson's disease: Neuroimaging and neurophysiology

Session Time: 12:00pm-1:30pm

Location: Exhibit Hall located in Hall B, Level 2

Objective: We attempted to find an objective tool by assessing the variability of levodopa induced change in the blink reflex recovery to differentiate Parkinsonian syndromes.

Background: Parkinson’s disease (PD) is primarily diagnosed by clinical examination. Of all the Parkinsonian conditions, progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP) patients are hard to differentiate from PD before the classical clinical signs appear. Blink reflex recovery abnormality due to hyperexcitability of brainstem interneurons has been demonstrated by Jun Kimura (1973). In 1987 Agostino etal demonstrated R2 recovery cycle became similar to that of normal subjects after fluctuation from "off" to "on" period in PD patients. No comparison has been made to date, of the effect of levodopa on blink reflex recovery in various Parkinsonian syndromes.

Methods: 24 clinically probable PD, 8 clinically probable PSP, 3 clinically probable MSA, 1 clinically probable CBD, 4 drug induced parkinsonism, 2 vascular parkinsonism patients underwent the study. Institutional ethics comittee approval and written consent were obtained. Three sets of two electrical test stimuli of equal intensity were applied at interstimulus intervals of 500ms and 1000ms after a conditioning stimulus. The test was done in "off" and "on" states (90 min after per oral administration of 100mg levodopa). During offline analysis we multiplied the largest peak to peak amplitude of ipsilateral R2 response with its total duration. The mean and standard deviation of recovery indices (R2 test/R2 condition) in both states were calculated. For correlation analysis, we used the student’s paired t test to calculate the significance of alteration of recovery index. The level of significance was taken as p<0.05.

Results: In PD patients the mean R2 decreased from 1.16 (500 ms off state) to 0.88 (500 ms on state) and 1.09 (1000ms off state) to 0.81 (1000ms on state). In PSP, there was no significant change in mean between two states. MSA patients showed an increase in R2 mean during on period.

Table 1 – Mean and SD values of R2 recovery index (R2 test/R2cond)
  Interstimulus interval "Off" state (Mean±SD) "On" state (Mean±SD)
PD (n=24) 500ms 1.16±0.46 0.88±0.36
  1000ms 1.09±0.5 0.81±0.32
PSP (n=8) 500ms 1.09±0.35 1.07±0.59
  1000ms 1.03±0.42 1.03±0.53
MSA (n=3) 500ms 0.8±0.35 0.99±0.37
  1000ms 0.75±0.73 1.02±0.32
CBD (n=1) 500ms 0.67±0.3 0.59±0.28
  1000ms 0.66±0.09 0.47±0.27
Drug induced parkinsonism (n=4) 500ms 1.32±0.95 1±0.56
  1000ms 1.20±0.77 1.13±0.7
Vascular parkinsonism (n=2) 500ms 0.99±0.69 0.49±0.26
  1000ms 1.08±1.08 0.38±0.15
n=number of patientsp value (<0.0001 at both interstimulus intervals) was statistically significant only in PD. In CBD, drug induced and vascular parkinsonism the decrease in mean was not stastistically significant.

Table 2- p value of R2 recovery index
  At interstimulus interval of 500ms At interstimulus interval of 1000ms
PD p<0.0001 p<0.0001
PSP p=0.8798 p=0.9678
MSA p=0.3728 p=0.4402
CBD p=0.7240 p=0.2389
Drug induced parkinsonism p=0.2197 p=0.8022
Vascular parkinsonism p=0.1998 0.1996
Pd-Parkinson’s disease, PSP-progressive supranuclear palsy,MSA-multisystem atrophy,CBD- corticobasal ganglionic degeneration“

Conclusions: Levodopa responsiveness of blink reflex recovery index can be an effective tool to differentiate PD from other Parkinsonian syndromes.

Indian academy of neurology conference: 2013.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

C. Gaddipati, M. Umaiorubahan, C.U. Velmurugendran, V. Shankar. Effectiveness of Levodopa responsiveness of Blink reflex recovery: An objective method to differentiate Parkinsonian syndromes [abstract]. Mov Disord. 2016; 31 (suppl 2). https://www.mdsabstracts.org/abstract/effectiveness-of-levodopa-responsiveness-of-blink-reflex-recovery-an-objective-method-to-differentiate-parkinsonian-syndromes/. Accessed May 17, 2025.
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2016 International Congress

MDS Abstracts - https://www.mdsabstracts.org/abstract/effectiveness-of-levodopa-responsiveness-of-blink-reflex-recovery-an-objective-method-to-differentiate-parkinsonian-syndromes/

Most Viewed Abstracts

  • This Week
  • This Month
  • All Time
  • Survey-Based study of marijuana used in Parkinson’s Disease patients
  • Covid vaccine induced parkinsonism and cognitive dysfunction
  • What is the appropriate sleep position for Parkinson's disease patients with orthostatic hypotension in the morning?
  • The hardest symptoms that bother patients with Parkinson's disease
  • An Apparent Cluster of Parkinson's Disease (PD) in a Golf Community
  • Life expectancy with and without Parkinson’s disease in the general population
    • Help & Support
    • About Us
    • Cookies & Privacy
    • Wiley Job Network
    • Terms & Conditions
    • Advertisers & Agents
    Copyright © 2025 International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society. All Rights Reserved.
    Wiley